Avenlo Onboarding — Illustrative Working Notes

Companion material prepared from the published presentation and speaker notes. It is not the original task input. Suggested task instructions are newly written, not historical prompts.

9-slide executive update; reporting period August 11–22.

Reporting note

Illustrative project scenario compiled to explain the published Avenlo executive update. Figures below describe the case, not independently verified customer outcomes. The published deck uses internal telemetry language; no underlying telemetry or historical input notes were recovered for this companion. Do not market these numbers as MuseWork customer performance.

Stand-up scratchpad: August 11–22

Onboarding redesign status: on track, scale carefully. Released to 30% of new accounts on August 18. No major stability issues reported to date in the case. Leadership needs two decisions, not a new broad redesign.
Before/after case figures, share of new users: first-project completion 46% → 63% (+17 percentage points); teammate invitation 28% → 39% (+11 points); seven-day activation 21% → 27% (+6 points). The experiment has run only six days in the readout; seven-day activation is an early directional signal, not a mature seven-day result. Sample sizes, allocation and statistical significance are not supplied; do not invent them.

Design / CS discussion

Changed the welcome from feature-led to intent-led. Reduced first-project flow from seven steps to four. Progressive next-task guidance instead of showing everything upfront. Invite a teammate after the relevant context is ready.
Desktop team path is working in the case; keep it intact. Mobile underperforms desktop and invitation feels complex; revised mobile design is complete, development next week. Solo consultants find team-first prompts confusing; invitation is not a valid activation goal for them. Need a separately scoped individual path, not a rework of the successful team journey. No quantitative mobile or solo-user sample supplied.

Engineering status pasted into notes

Project-creation timeout: resolved. Error rate 2.8% → 0.7%; monitor under broader exposure.
Mobile invitation: design done; enter development next week.
Template recommendation service: delayed, response time does not meet rollout requirement. This is the only named issue with a schedule consequence; full rollout may slip one week. Request temporary capacity of one backend engineer.
Solo-user path: product/CS scope decision; does not block the current team experiment. Owners are functions, not invented named employees.

Next experiment / decisions needed

Current 30% exposure → telemetry check → proposed 70% exposure with gates → mobile build next week → full rollout decision. No exact full-rollout date is committed. Accept a one-week slip if service latency stays unresolved.
Monitor seven-day activation, invitations, time to first collaboration and mobile drop-off at every gate. Return with mature seven-day evidence; do not declare full success from the early readout.
Ask leadership to approve both: prioritize scoped solo-user onboarding discovery; assign one backend engineer to the recommendation service. Proceed to controlled 70% exposure. No dollar budget, extra cohort, ticket sample or duplicate-event claim is supplied.

Published presentation coverage

Pages 1–2: status and executive decisions; 3: baseline/redesign evidence; 4: shorter intent-led flow; 5: mobile and solo friction; 6: service dependency; 7: controlled expansion; 8: two approvals; 9: next learning cycle.